What work can it take on?
Eligible share of actual requests. Reachable targets, required access and reliable input data. Keep unsupported cases in the denominator.
THE CASE FOR AUTONOMOUS IT
The opportunity is bigger than running a command. AutoSolve takes on the investigation, the choice of a fix, the permitted action and the checks around it.
Build a case around the work your company actually handles. See what changes operationally, model the capacity it could release, and define what a pilot must prove.
01 / THE OPERATING MODEL
Choose a starting point. Follow the work that would otherwise move between a queue, an engineer and several tools.
From a request to a checked repair.
Inspect an actual application repairAutoSolve connects the request to the authorized user and affected device. It discovers the target environment instead of assuming an operating system.
The agent collects permitted evidence: application responses, configuration, processes and other relevant system facts.
AutoSolve evaluates useful past resolutions. When none fits, AI generates a new solution using the observed evidence and target constraints.
AutoSolve evaluates the actual action and target against company policy. Eligible work can proceed automatically; required review stays with an authorized person.
The connected agent performs the authorized action. Separate verification checks test the result; command completion alone is not recovery.
The result is recorded, the employee can confirm whether work is restored, and successes or failures inform future resolution selection.
From a signal to an evidence-backed response.
Explore evidence-driven remediationConfigured monitoring and incident sources provide the alert and affected-resource context. Prometheus is an existing telemetry integration.
AutoSolve gathers permitted runtime and health evidence for the identified resource, using its available agent or cloud inspection path.
It ranks relevant historical fixes using outcomes, or prepares a new plan against the current evidence, prerequisites and execution constraints.
Access, target scope and the actual change determine whether execution is allowed automatically or needs bound human approval.
Work can dispatch through configured agents, AWS SSM, Azure VM Run Command or the GCP execution path. The plan’s checks assess the result.
Failure evidence remains visible. When retry policy permits, AutoSolve can generate a revised plan with fresh approval, or leave the unresolved work for a person.
From a repeated procedure to governed automation.
Explore reusable automationA user describes the outcome and operating constraints. A reusable automation can begin with a plain-language goal, not a hand-written script.
AutoSolve resolves the target and available tools, and uses relevant operational evidence and historical knowledge when available.
AI prepares the executable approach, required inputs, prerequisites and checks. Saved capabilities can be reused when appropriate.
Your team defines the authorized targets, access, schedule or trigger and execution policy. A generated plan still has to meet those requirements.
The configured execution path performs the work and records its verification results. Missing prerequisites and failed checks remain explicit.
Execution history, exceptions and outcomes give operators a basis for refining the automation and deciding where it can be used again.
Workflow illustrations, not live executions. Your pilot confirms the connections, allowed actions and verification needed for your environment.
02 / YOUR CAPACITY MODEL
Use non-overlapping groups of work. Estimate how much is eligible and the human time that remains—including approvals, failed attempts and exceptions.
03 / THE INVESTMENT DECISION
Your case gets stronger when assumptions become observed results. Agree these measures before connecting the first workflow.
Define the pilot with usEligible share of actual requests. Reachable targets, required access and reliable input data. Keep unsupported cases in the denominator.
Execution, verification and user confirmation tracked separately. Record reopens, failed attempts and repeated incidents.
Measure investigation, approvals, exceptions, maintenance and follow-up—not just time spent clicking “Run.”
Compare measured people-time with software, model, infrastructure, integration and support costs. Treat contract savings as a separate decision.