Investigate before escalating.
Gather the affected target’s available runtime, resource and application evidence. Ask for missing context when the system cannot establish it.
AUTOSOLVE FOR EMPLOYEE IT SUPPORT
“My app is frozen.” “I can’t connect.” “This keeps happening.” Employees should be able to describe the problem and let AutoSolve do the technical work.
AutoSolve investigates the connected system, uses relevant past resolutions or generates a new solution, performs eligible actions under your company’s policy, and checks the result.
A COMPLETED PRODUCT TEST · OCTOBER 20, 2026
An individually signed-in employee submitted a frozen-app request. On the enrolled Windows test device, AutoSolve completed the following workflow:
AutoSolve resolved the assigned target and the running application from system evidence. The employee did not supply a process number.
The configured policy automatically authorized this specific action on this specific agent, bound to the final signed plan. No separate human approval was needed.
The native agent closed the test application and its required check passed. Independent inspection confirmed the original process was gone; the application was then reopened.
The employee result and resolved feedback were saved and reloaded through the application’s API. Execution evidence remained attached to the request.
This was a real API-to-native-agent execution using a synthetic application, not a customer deployment. It demonstrates an automatically authorized close action and its verification on Windows. It does not establish recovery of every frozen application, preservation of unsaved work, or the same result on every operating system.
The wider product can learn and generate solutions; this particular completed action used an existing capability. The website’s separate recordings show AI solution generation and a human-approved Linux execution.
Inspect the other product recordsTHE VALUE IS THE WORK AROUND THE FIX
Gather the affected target’s available runtime, resource and application evidence. Ask for missing context when the system cannot establish it.
Bring actionable resolution history into the investigation. Recorded successes, failures and employee feedback help rank future candidates.
AI can generate a new response from the request, target evidence and constraints. The employee does not have to become a script author.
Keep completed actions, verification checks and unresolved issues distinct. A finished command is not automatically a recovered incident.
AUTOMATIC WHERE AUTHORIZED
Eligible work can execute automatically when the actual plan, target, risk and confidence satisfy the configured company policy. A device assignment or familiar ticket description alone does not authorize every action.
Work requiring review, missing access or unresolved uncertainty goes to the appropriate next step with the reason attached. Employees should not have to approve routine diagnostics or understand implementation details.
Review execution controlsWe will map each one to the employee journey, the systems it touches, the work AutoSolve can perform and the exceptions a person still handles.
A pilot measures verified outcomes, remaining technician time and failed cases against your current process.
Discuss my support workloadNo credentials or employee records needed for the first conversation. Scope and commercial terms agreed before paid work.
You can evaluate employee intake and configured ticket integrations alongside your existing service desk. Establish how requests, work notes, ownership and outcomes move between systems during setup.
No. The company configures execution policy. Eligible actions can be automatically authorized; actions outside that scope require the applicable review. A changed plan or target is evaluated again.
No. AutoSolve discovers the target’s operating system, runtime and available execution path. Endpoint agents and configured cloud connections have different requirements. The completed example above is Windows-specific evidence; compatibility is checked for each target.
Use measured workload coverage to make that decision. Start with representative requests, count exceptions and remaining human effort, and compare total operating costs. No blanket replacement percentage is promised.